Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 04:13

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Posting Memes With Pride - Vulture
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Non est eum facere impedit aut dignissimos tempora.
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Taylor Swift Spotted at Nashville Wedding In Gorgeous Blue & Pink Dress - Just Jared
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
The #1 Anti-Inflammatory Diet Habit You Should Start, According to Dietitians - EatingWell
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Boston Red Sox rookie ‘revelation’ made ‘huge’ throw before walkoff - MassLive
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Disney and Universal’s Lawsuit Against Midjourney, Explained - Vulture